Paste the address
Drop any email into the pill — Gmail, Outlook, custom domains, or role aliases like info@ and sales@. Verify one address free right now, or upload a CSV to check a whole list once you sign up.
Paste a Gmail address or username and see if it is a real, deliverable gmail.com mailbox with 99.99% accuracy, on the same 9-point engine, no signup.
Trusted by 500,000+ leading GTM teams of all sizes
Three steps, no signup, no card on file. Paste a Gmail address or username, watch the nine-check engine ping Google's servers, verdict in two seconds.
Drop any email into the pill — Gmail, Outlook, custom domains, or role aliases like info@ and sales@. Verify one address free right now, or upload a CSV to check a whole list once you sign up.
Nine checks fire in parallel: syntax, DNS, and MX records, a live SMTP handshake, catch-all and disposable detection, role and domain-age signals, mailbox state, and email authentication. The full verdict then lands in about two seconds.
Every address comes back valid, invalid, or risky, with a confidence score, the full per-check breakdown, and a recommended retry policy. Read the result right there on the page, or pull it straight from the API.
From one pasted address to a full CSV, every check runs the same nine-layer engine and hands you a verdict you can send on.
Paste an address and the checker runs all nine deliverability layers (syntax to live SMTP) and hands back a verdict, a 0-100 confidence score, and the full check-by-check breakdown. You send to a confirmed inbox, never a hopeful guess.


Upload a CSV or paste a list, and the checker works the entire batch (the same nine-check engine on every single row), then returns a clean file split into valid, risky, and invalid, ready to export.


One REST call verifies an address and returns the verdict as JSON , with cURL, Node, and Python examples ready to copy. Wiring an AI agent instead? The same verification ships as a native MCP server.


Every check you run rolls up into one activity view: volume, valid rate, and risk trends across single checks, bulk jobs, and API calls, so you catch a decaying list before it dents your sender reputation.


Not a signup-availability check. A live mailbox check, run on the same 9-point engine as the paid API.
A Gmail username checker tells you whether a gmail.com address is a live mailbox. Paste a full address or a bare username and get the verdict, the same job as a gmail address checker or gmail email verifier. One caveat: this confirms whether an address can receive mail, not whether a username is free to register, only Google’s signup flow decides that. For other domains and bulk lists, the free email checker and free email validator run the same engine, with API docs and pay-as-you-go credits.
Most free Gmail checkers rely on syntax or cached lists. Ours runs nine paid-grade checks against Google's servers to confirm mailboxes.
The same nine-check pipeline as the paid API runs on every address, free or not.
Verify your first emails right here, no account, no card.
Bulk CSV in, verified list out. Same speed on every plan.
Every address comes back already checked, with a confidence score.
Validated on a 10,000-address mixed benchmark including catch-all domains.
1,000 free on signup. 2,500 with a work email. Pay as you go after.
Processed in memory, dropped on response. SOC 2 · GDPR · CCPA.
NeverBounce and ZeroBounce both verify Gmail addresses well. Verifox weighs the same live SMTP verdict against disposable and reputation signals & 99.99% accuracy.
Growth leads, marketers, and engineers running real campaigns on real lists, with a verified email on every byline.

We were paying ZeroBounce a four-figure monthly bill and still landing 3% bounces on cold campaigns. Switched the pipeline to Verifox, dropped to 0.4% bounces, and cut the bill by more than 90%.

Other tools flag 30% of our B2B list as 'risky catch-all' and leave the call to us. Verifox returns a real verdict on those addresses, with a confidence score. We send more, we send safer.

We had a Gmail spam-folder problem after a bad list import. Verifox cleaned the list and the warmup ran on the same engine. Back in primary inbox in six weeks. One vendor, half the cost.

Ran a 50,000-address outbound list through Verifox before our quarterly campaign. Bounces landed at 0.7%, sender reputation didn't move, replies were up 22% over last quarter.

Their MCP server let me wire email verification directly into our internal Claude agent in about ten minutes. Zero glue code. No other vendor in this space has thought about that workflow.

Tested Verifox at 10,000 verifications per minute on a Tuesday morning. Latency held under 400ms median, no soft failures, no rate-limit walls. The vendor we benched throttled at 2,000/min.

Our SDRs were enriching from three tools and 14% of the emails were invalid before they hit the sequencer. Verifox sits in the pipeline now and the team stopped seeing 'undeliverable' replies the next week.

Bulk upload, sorted CSV back in twenty minutes, plug into our growth stack. The half-day list-hygiene project per cohort turned into something the marketing intern runs on autopilot.

Verifox returns a 0-100 confidence score per address, not just a label. We thresholded at 75 for the cold sequencer, 60 for nurture, and our deliverability team finally has a knob they can tune.

We were paying ZeroBounce a four-figure monthly bill and still landing 3% bounces on cold campaigns. Switched the pipeline to Verifox, dropped to 0.4% bounces, and cut the bill by more than 90%.

We had a Gmail spam-folder problem after a bad list import. Verifox cleaned the list and the warmup ran on the same engine. Back in primary inbox in six weeks. One vendor, half the cost.

Their MCP server let me wire email verification directly into our internal Claude agent in about ten minutes. Zero glue code. No other vendor in this space has thought about that workflow.

Our SDRs were enriching from three tools and 14% of the emails were invalid before they hit the sequencer. Verifox sits in the pipeline now and the team stopped seeing 'undeliverable' replies the next week.

Verifox returns a 0-100 confidence score per address, not just a label. We thresholded at 75 for the cold sequencer, 60 for nurture, and our deliverability team finally has a knob they can tune.

Other tools flag 30% of our B2B list as 'risky catch-all' and leave the call to us. Verifox returns a real verdict on those addresses, with a confidence score. We send more, we send safer.

Ran a 50,000-address outbound list through Verifox before our quarterly campaign. Bounces landed at 0.7%, sender reputation didn't move, replies were up 22% over last quarter.

Tested Verifox at 10,000 verifications per minute on a Tuesday morning. Latency held under 400ms median, no soft failures, no rate-limit walls. The vendor we benched throttled at 2,000/min.

Bulk upload, sorted CSV back in twenty minutes, plug into our growth stack. The half-day list-hygiene project per cohort turned into something the marketing intern runs on autopilot.

We were paying ZeroBounce a four-figure monthly bill and still landing 3% bounces on cold campaigns. Switched the pipeline to Verifox, dropped to 0.4% bounces, and cut the bill by more than 90%.

Ran a 50,000-address outbound list through Verifox before our quarterly campaign. Bounces landed at 0.7%, sender reputation didn't move, replies were up 22% over last quarter.

Our SDRs were enriching from three tools and 14% of the emails were invalid before they hit the sequencer. Verifox sits in the pipeline now and the team stopped seeing 'undeliverable' replies the next week.

Other tools flag 30% of our B2B list as 'risky catch-all' and leave the call to us. Verifox returns a real verdict on those addresses, with a confidence score. We send more, we send safer.

Their MCP server let me wire email verification directly into our internal Claude agent in about ten minutes. Zero glue code. No other vendor in this space has thought about that workflow.

Bulk upload, sorted CSV back in twenty minutes, plug into our growth stack. The half-day list-hygiene project per cohort turned into something the marketing intern runs on autopilot.

We had a Gmail spam-folder problem after a bad list import. Verifox cleaned the list and the warmup ran on the same engine. Back in primary inbox in six weeks. One vendor, half the cost.

Tested Verifox at 10,000 verifications per minute on a Tuesday morning. Latency held under 400ms median, no soft failures, no rate-limit walls. The vendor we benched throttled at 2,000/min.

Verifox returns a 0-100 confidence score per address, not just a label. We thresholded at 75 for the cold sequencer, 60 for nurture, and our deliverability team finally has a knob they can tune.
Every layer of the stack carries a third-party attestation, so you can ship into regulated industries without rebuilding your compliance posture.

Independently audited to the SOC 2 Type II standard.

Built for the EU with full GDPR data-subject rights.

California opt-out, do-not-sell, plus DSAR handling.

Information security held to the ISO 27001 standard.

AI governance aligned to the new ISO 42001 standard.
An investigation into the money leaking out of your list - and the nine checks that decide whether your email is read, or never arrives at all.

57 pages, free PDF, no signup
Common questions
The questions we get from people who land here to check a Gmail address or username, with the real numbers, real limits, and real opinions behind our verification stack.
Yes. You get 4 Gmail checks per day from this page with no account, no card. Each one is a live SMTP conversation with Google’s servers, not a stripped-down preview, so four checks is enough to settle a “does this gmail.com mailbox still exist” question on the spot.
Need more than a handful? Create a free account and 1,000 checks unlock instantly, 2,500 if your signup email is a work address. Beyond that, credits are pay-as-you-go and never expire on any paid plan, with volume pricing shown for your region.
Either works. If you have the full address, paste [email protected] and run it. If you only have the username, add @gmail.com to the end and check that. Every Gmail username maps to exactly one gmail.com mailbox, so the username plus the domain is all the checker needs.
Worth knowing for Gmail specifically: Google ignores dots and anything after a + in the local part, so [email protected] and [email protected] reach the same inbox. The checker resolves to the real underlying mailbox either way.
It confirms whether a gmail.com address is a real mailbox that can receive mail. Nine checks run in parallel every time you check a Gmail address:
For Gmail, the MX + SMTP pair does the heavy lifting: it talks to Google’s receiving servers to confirm the specific mailbox is live before you ever send. If you want to check any email address one at a time, the checker runs the very same engine on every domain.
No, and that distinction matters. This is a Gmail email verifier: it tells you whether an address already exists and can receive mail. It does not tell you whether a username is free to claim as a new Google account, which only Google’s signup flow can answer.
In practice the two are opposites. If the checker says a Gmail address is deliverable, that mailbox is taken and live. If it comes back undeliverable, no one is receiving mail there. Use this to clean a list or confirm a contact, not to scout open usernames.
99.99 % accuracy on a 1,000-address benchmark list, and Gmail verdicts sit at the clean end of that range. gmail.com is not a catch-all domain and Google’s SMTP responses are unambiguous: a dead mailbox is refused with a hard 550-5.1.1 “address does not exist” rejection, a live one accepts the handshake. Compare that with B2B lists, where 20-40 % of addresses hide behind catch-all servers that accept everything and force a confidence call.
The free tier caps volume, never accuracy. A Gmail address checked here gets the identical pipeline the paid Email Verification API and every paid plan run.
Yes. Gmail is usually the single largest domain on a consumer list, and a free signup covers 1,000 checks (2,500 with a work email), enough to sweep the gmail.com column of most small lists in one CSV upload. The engine also recognises Gmail’s aliasing as it goes: dotted variants, +tags, and the older googlemail.com spelling all resolve to the same underlying mailbox, so duplicates surface instead of silently burning credits.
For larger lists, paid credit packs are pay-as-you-go and never expire, with pricing localized to your region. CSV upload, API access, and parallel processing are included from the free tier up, and the free email validator takes mixed lists where Gmail sits next to every other domain.
No. A Gmail check is a live conversation with Google’s receiving servers, not a query against a saved database. The address rides the SMTP handshake out, the verdict comes back, and the address is discarded from memory the moment the check completes. There is no record of which gmail.com accounts you looked up, and nothing to retain or sell.
We’re SOC 2 Type II compliant with the full Trust Center report on request. The privacy policy spells out byte by byte what we touch and what we don’t.
The widget pauses at 4 anonymous checks and resets 24 hours later. Mid-list with more Gmail contacts to confirm? Create a free account and 1,000 checks open up on the spot (2,500 if your signup email is a work address), still with no card on file.
Teams who verify gmail.com-heavy lists of 10,000+ on a schedule usually graduate to a paid credit pack, since credits never expire and carry across runs.
A single check returns in about 380 ms median, and Gmail tends to land on the fast side of that: Google’s MX endpoints answer promptly, and recently verified gmail.com results come from cache at sub-50 ms. Bulk runs at roughly 10,000 emails per minute on the standard tier, and Gmail-heavy lists hold that pace because gmail.com verdicts rarely need the extra passes ambiguous catch-all domains do.
SLA is 99.9 % uptime on Starter, 99.99 % with an annual Volume contract. Real-time uptime and incident history live at status.verifox.ai, and the request and response shapes are in the API docs.
Yes. The REST API reference documents the inbound and outbound shapes for every endpoint, so you can drop real-time Gmail verification into signup forms, CRMs, or any tool that speaks REST. HubSpot, Salesforce, Zapier, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, and Brevo all connect out of the box.
Verifox also ships native MCP server support so AI agents (Claude, Cursor, custom LLM apps) can verify Gmail addresses without glue code. Drop the MCP URL into your agent config and the tools are wired.