Enter a domain
Drop in any domain whose mail server you want to test. No login, no account, nothing to install. A single domain is all the SMTP test needs to start.
SMTP server test
Enter any domain to find the mail server that receives its email, see whether mail has somewhere to land, and learn which provider runs it. No signup.
Trusted by 500,000+ leading GTM teams of all sizes
From domain to mail server
Three steps, no login, no install. Enter a domain, Verifox runs a live lookup of its mail servers, then read which host receives the domain's email, whether mail has somewhere to land, and who runs it.
Drop in any domain whose mail server you want to test. No login, no account, nothing to install. A single domain is all the SMTP test needs to start.
Verifox runs a live lookup of the domain's mail servers, the same routing step our verification engine resolves before it opens the SMTP connection shown here, the handshake that goes straight to the receiving server.
See which mail server answers for the domain, whether mail has somewhere to land, and which provider runs it. That is the deliverability signal a verification starts from.
What it tells you
An SMTP test is a read-only window into how a domain receives email. In one connection you learn whether the mail server is alive, who runs it, and whether the domain can accept mail at all.
The test confirms the domain's mail server answers the connection and the SMTP greeting, the single most useful thing an SMTP server test tells you, because a server that never replies can never accept your mail.
The server hostname names the provider behind a domain at a glance, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, or a self-hosted server, so you know exactly what is on the other end of the SMTP connection.
A server that refuses connections or has no mail host means mail will bounce before it is read. An SMTP test is step one of deliverability, then verifying the address confirms the mailbox itself.
This is the exact SMTP handshake Verifox runs inside its verification engine, exposed here free. Pair it with an MX record lookup to see the full mail-routing picture.
The checks
Four checks, one connection. The live lookup above covers the routing and the provider; the verification engine completes the full handshake on every address it checks.
Resolves the domain to its mail server and confirms a connection can be opened on the delivery path.
Reads the server's reply to the opening SMTP conversation, the 220 greeting and EHLO, to confirm it is a live, responding mail server.
Confirms the server agrees to receive mail for the domain, the deliverability signal that says messages have somewhere to land.
Names the provider behind the server in plain English, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, or a self-hosted server.
The plain-English version
An SMTP test answers a deceptively simple question: if I send mail to this domain, is there a live server ready to take it? Email moves between servers over the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol, so the test resolves the domain to its mail server, opens an SMTP connection, and reads how that server answers the opening handshake. A healthy server returns a 220 greeting, accepts the EHLO, and signals that it will receive mail. A server that refuses the connection, times out, or errors never gets that far, and mail bound for it will bounce.
The reply tells you more than pass or fail. The server hostname gives away the provider, a host ending in aspmx.l.google.com means Google Workspace, mail.protection.outlook.com means Microsoft 365, and a custom hostname usually means a self-hosted or niche server. The port matters too: server-to-server delivery rides port 25, which is the path real inbound mail takes and the one this test exercises, while mail clients submit on 587 or 465. Seeing the mail server respond on the delivery path is exactly why this is the first live check our verification engine runs after it resolves a domain's routing.
Here is the honest boundary, though. An SMTP test on the server proves the domain can accept mail; it does not prove a specific mailbox is real, because many servers accept every recipient at the handshake and bounce unknown addresses only afterward. So an SMTP test is step one of deliverability, not the whole story. When you need to confirm an actual address is reachable, the free email checker finishes the mailbox check, the MX lookup shows the full routing, and checking SPF, DKIM, and DMARC covers the authentication that decides inbox versus spam. Wiring any of it into your own stack or an AI agent? The same engine is available through the REST API and a native MCP server, with pay-as-you-go pricing localized to your region on the pricing page.
How we stack up
MXToolbox, GMass, and Mailtrap all check whether a mail server responds. Verifox names the provider in plain English, runs ad-free with no signup, and flows the test straight into a real mailbox verification that a standalone SMTP tool cannot.
| Feature | Verifox | MXToolbox | GMass | Mailtrap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tests if the server responds | ||||
| Names the mail provider | Plain English | Hostnames | Hostnames | Hostnames |
| No ads, no signup wall | ||||
| Flows into mailbox verification | Built in | |||
| REST API for tests | ||||
| MCP server for AI agents | ||||
| Bulk domain testing | ||||
| Pricing model | Pay as you go | Subscription | Subscription | Subscription |
What teams are saying
Growth leads, marketers, and engineers running real campaigns on real lists, with a verified email on every byline.

We were paying ZeroBounce a four-figure monthly bill and still landing 3% bounces on cold campaigns. Switched the pipeline to Verifox, dropped to 0.4% bounces, and cut the bill by more than 90%.

Other tools flag 30% of our B2B list as 'risky catch-all' and leave the call to us. Verifox returns a real verdict on those addresses, with a confidence score. We send more, we send safer.

We had a Gmail spam-folder problem after a bad list import. Verifox cleaned the list and the warmup ran on the same engine. Back in primary inbox in six weeks. One vendor, half the cost.

Ran a 50,000-address outbound list through Verifox before our quarterly campaign. Bounces landed at 0.7%, sender reputation didn't move, replies were up 22% over last quarter.

Their MCP server let me wire email verification directly into our internal Claude agent in about ten minutes. Zero glue code. No other vendor in this space has thought about that workflow.

Tested Verifox at 10,000 verifications per minute on a Tuesday morning. Latency held under 400ms median, no soft failures, no rate-limit walls. The vendor we benched throttled at 2,000/min.

Our SDRs were enriching from three tools and 14% of the emails were invalid before they hit the sequencer. Verifox sits in the pipeline now and the team stopped seeing 'undeliverable' replies the next week.

Bulk upload, sorted CSV back in twenty minutes, plug into our growth stack. The half-day list-hygiene project per cohort turned into something the marketing intern runs on autopilot.

Verifox returns a 0-100 confidence score per address, not just a label. We thresholded at 75 for the cold sequencer, 60 for nurture, and our deliverability team finally has a knob they can tune.

We were paying ZeroBounce a four-figure monthly bill and still landing 3% bounces on cold campaigns. Switched the pipeline to Verifox, dropped to 0.4% bounces, and cut the bill by more than 90%.

We had a Gmail spam-folder problem after a bad list import. Verifox cleaned the list and the warmup ran on the same engine. Back in primary inbox in six weeks. One vendor, half the cost.

Their MCP server let me wire email verification directly into our internal Claude agent in about ten minutes. Zero glue code. No other vendor in this space has thought about that workflow.

Our SDRs were enriching from three tools and 14% of the emails were invalid before they hit the sequencer. Verifox sits in the pipeline now and the team stopped seeing 'undeliverable' replies the next week.

Verifox returns a 0-100 confidence score per address, not just a label. We thresholded at 75 for the cold sequencer, 60 for nurture, and our deliverability team finally has a knob they can tune.

Other tools flag 30% of our B2B list as 'risky catch-all' and leave the call to us. Verifox returns a real verdict on those addresses, with a confidence score. We send more, we send safer.

Ran a 50,000-address outbound list through Verifox before our quarterly campaign. Bounces landed at 0.7%, sender reputation didn't move, replies were up 22% over last quarter.

Tested Verifox at 10,000 verifications per minute on a Tuesday morning. Latency held under 400ms median, no soft failures, no rate-limit walls. The vendor we benched throttled at 2,000/min.

Bulk upload, sorted CSV back in twenty minutes, plug into our growth stack. The half-day list-hygiene project per cohort turned into something the marketing intern runs on autopilot.

We were paying ZeroBounce a four-figure monthly bill and still landing 3% bounces on cold campaigns. Switched the pipeline to Verifox, dropped to 0.4% bounces, and cut the bill by more than 90%.

Ran a 50,000-address outbound list through Verifox before our quarterly campaign. Bounces landed at 0.7%, sender reputation didn't move, replies were up 22% over last quarter.

Our SDRs were enriching from three tools and 14% of the emails were invalid before they hit the sequencer. Verifox sits in the pipeline now and the team stopped seeing 'undeliverable' replies the next week.

Other tools flag 30% of our B2B list as 'risky catch-all' and leave the call to us. Verifox returns a real verdict on those addresses, with a confidence score. We send more, we send safer.

Their MCP server let me wire email verification directly into our internal Claude agent in about ten minutes. Zero glue code. No other vendor in this space has thought about that workflow.

Bulk upload, sorted CSV back in twenty minutes, plug into our growth stack. The half-day list-hygiene project per cohort turned into something the marketing intern runs on autopilot.

We had a Gmail spam-folder problem after a bad list import. Verifox cleaned the list and the warmup ran on the same engine. Back in primary inbox in six weeks. One vendor, half the cost.

Tested Verifox at 10,000 verifications per minute on a Tuesday morning. Latency held under 400ms median, no soft failures, no rate-limit walls. The vendor we benched throttled at 2,000/min.

Verifox returns a 0-100 confidence score per address, not just a label. We thresholded at 75 for the cold sequencer, 60 for nurture, and our deliverability team finally has a knob they can tune.
Trust & compliance
Every layer of the stack carries a third-party attestation, so you can ship into regulated industries without rebuilding your compliance posture.

Independently audited to the SOC 2 Type II standard.

Built for the EU with full GDPR data-subject rights.

California opt-out, do-not-sell, plus DSAR handling.

Information security held to the ISO 27001 standard.

AI governance aligned to the new ISO 42001 standard.
Common questions
The questions we get from teams that land here to test a domain's mail server, with what the handshake proves, which ports matter, why a test fails, and where it fits in the deliverability picture.
An SMTP test checks whether a domain's mail server is reachable and willing to receive email. It resolves the domain to the server that handles its mail, opens an SMTP connection, and reads how the server replies to the opening handshake. Type a domain into the tool above and Verifox runs a live lookup of its mail servers, names the host that receives the domain's email, and shows whether mail has somewhere to land.
It is the fastest way to answer one question that bounces and silent drops hinge on: if I send mail to this domain, is there a live server on the other end ready to accept it? That is the exact SMTP step our verification engine runs after it resolves the MX records.
When one mail server delivers to another, they hold a short conversation in the Simple Mail Transfer Protocol. The sender connects, the receiver answers with a 220 greeting, the sender says EHLO, and they negotiate encryption and the envelope (MAIL FROM and RCPT TO) before any message body is sent.
An SMTP test exercises the front of that exchange. A healthy server answers the connection and the greeting promptly; a server that times out, refuses the connection, or returns an error never gets to accept your mail. That handshake is also where mailbox-level verification begins, which is why the test doubles as a deliverability check.
The simplest way is to paste the domain into the SMTP test above and read the result. No account, no install. Verifox runs a live lookup of the mail server behind the domain and shows the host that would answer the SMTP connection, hostname in plain sight. The full handshake against that server is the step the verification engine runs on every check.
You can also test from a terminal with openssl s_client -connect mail.example.com:25 -starttls smtp or an old-school telnet mail.example.com 25, but those make you read raw protocol replies yourself. The Verifox test names the mail provider in plain English and flows straight into a real mailbox verification when you need to go past the handshake.
Three things. First, whether mail is accepted at all, a live server that answers the handshake can receive email; a dead one means every message bounces. Second, which server and provider handle the mail, so you can see whether the domain runs on Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, or a self-hosted server; the mail domain lookup goes deeper on that ownership picture. Third, a baseline deliverability signal for that domain.
What an SMTP test on the server cannot prove by itself is that one specific address exists, because many servers accept every recipient at the handshake and only reject unknown mailboxes later. To confirm a single address is reachable, the mailbox itself has to be checked, which is the step the test alone cannot finish.
Server-to-server mail delivery uses port 25, which is the port an SMTP test for inbound mail cares about, it is where another mail server connects to hand off a message. Submission from a mail client uses port 587 (with STARTTLS) or the older port 465 (implicit TLS).
The test above is concerned with the delivery path, the same path real mail takes to the domain's receiving server. If you are configuring a mail client instead and need the submission host and port for a provider, the mail client server settings lookup pulls the documented IMAP, POP, and SMTP settings, and the MX lookup identifies the provider behind the domain.
A failed SMTP test usually means one of a few things: the domain publishes no mail server (no MX record), so nothing is listening; the server is down or refusing connections; a firewall is blocking port 25; or the domain itself does not resolve (a typo, an expired registration, or a DNS misconfiguration). In every case, mail to that domain will bounce or stall.
If you are chasing bounces, an SMTP test is the first place to look. Then a mail exchanger lookup confirms the routing, checking SPF, DKIM, and DMARC covers the authentication side that decides inbox versus spam, and a full email deliverability test rolls every signal into one report.
Yes. The single test above is free with no account. For a list of domains, the REST API resolves the mail server and reports the SMTP response for each one, so you can run a bulk SMTP test across a whole list programmatically and feed the results into your CRM or onboarding flow.
Bulk checks run on the same pay-as-you-go credits as the rest of the platform, localized to your region, and those credits never expire. One credit covers a single domain check.
No, and the difference matters. An SMTP test on the server checks the domain's mail server, is it alive and accepting connections. Verifying an email checks the specific mailbox, does jane@example.com actually exist and accept mail.
A domain can have a perfectly healthy SMTP server while a given address on it is dead, and some servers accept every recipient at the handshake and bounce unknown ones only afterward. That is why an SMTP test is step one of deliverability and the free email checker is step two. Verifox runs both on the same engine.
No. The domain you enter is resolved in memory and discarded the moment the test completes. Nothing logged, nothing retained, nothing sold. A mail server's response is public, queryable data, but your tests are still yours.
Verifox is SOC 2 Type II compliant and GDPR ready. The full breakdown of what we touch and what we do not is in the privacy policy.
Yes. The REST API reference documents an endpoint that resolves a domain's mail server and returns its SMTP response, so you can wire mail-server checks into your CRM, your signup flow, or any tool that speaks REST.
Verifox also ships native MCP server support, so AI agents (Claude, Cursor, custom LLM apps) can test a domain's SMTP server and verify addresses without glue code. Live uptime and incident history are at status.verifox.ai.