Drop in any address
Paste a single email, upload a CSV for bulk scoring, or call the REST API. Catch-all domains, free-mail addresses, and corporate inboxes all take the same path through the engine.
Email Scoring
Verifox gives every address a 0-100 confidence score built from 40+ behavioral signals, so catch-all addresses get a real verdict instead.
Trusted by 500,000+ leading GTM teams
Three stages, 40+ signals, one score. Cached results return in under 50ms, even on catch-all domains.
Paste a single email, upload a CSV for bulk scoring, or call the REST API. Catch-all domains, free-mail addresses, and corporate inboxes all take the same path through the engine.
Open timestamps, click recency, reply cadence, and device diversity run alongside domain-level bounce history and pattern analysis against millions of known role and disposable templates.
Every signal compresses into one 0 to 100 score with a tier attached: Safe, Review, Risky, or Do Not Send. No ambiguous 'unknown' bucket, even on catch-all setups.
A 0 to 100 confidence number that replaces the shrug catch-all domains get from a binary checker.
Email scoring assigns every address a 0 to 100 confidence score instead of the flat valid-or-invalid verdict you get from a standard checker. The number answers a more useful question: how likely is it that a real, active person reads mail at this address? A brand-new corporate mailbox and a mailbox abandoned in 2022 can both pass an SMTP check. Scoring tells them apart. Classic email verification runs the deterministic checks first: syntax, MX records, the SMTP handshake, disposable and role detection. Scoring then layers 40+ behavioral signals on top and compresses them into one number you can sort a spreadsheet by.
Deterministic checks answer whether a mailbox exists. These four layers answer the more useful question of whether anyone is behind it.
A catch-all server accepts every address you offer it, which is why between 20 and 40% of a B2B list comes back “unknown” from a binary checker. Scoring reads the bounce history and configuration behind that acceptance and returns a real number instead.

Engagement history, domain-level bounce patterns, mailbox age, and how the address behaves against comparable domains. A brand-new corporate mailbox and one abandoned in 2022 both pass an SMTP check; only behaviour tells them apart.

Disposable domains, role inboxes nobody reads, and the trap-adjacent patterns that quietly damage sender reputation are separated out and scored down, so the expensive addresses never make it into your primary campaign in the first place.

The same score is available over the API in under 50 milliseconds, so a fake registration can be rejected while the form is still open rather than cleaned out of your database three months later.

A verdict tells you whether to send. A score tells you how much risk you are carrying, and which addresses are carrying it.
Every score is computed live from the nine checks, never a cached band.
Not just a number. The signals that put it where it landed.
Where ESPs start throttling. The score keeps you under it.
The catch-all share other tools return as a flat unknown.
How long ESPs take to re-evaluate once you clean up.
1,000 free on signup. 2,500 with a work email. Pay as you go after.
Scored in memory, dropped on response. SOC 2 · GDPR · CCPA.
Most tools reset your balance every month. Verifox sells credits that sit in your account until you spend them.
forever
1,000credits on signup
No card required
2,500 with a work email
Free includes
one time
10,000credits
$0.0059 eachSAVE 34%
Everything in Free, plus
per month
15,000credits a month
$0.0053 each
Unused credits roll over
Everything in packs, plus
One credit verifies one address; a find costs 10. All prices in USD, checkout via Stripe.
Growth leads, marketers, and engineers running real campaigns on real lists, with a verified email on every byline.

We were paying ZeroBounce a four-figure monthly bill and still landing 3% bounces on cold campaigns. Switched the pipeline to Verifox, dropped to 0.4% bounces, and cut the bill by more than 90%.

Other tools flag 30% of our B2B list as 'risky catch-all' and leave the call to us. Verifox returns a real verdict on those addresses, with a confidence score. We send more, we send safer.

We had a Gmail spam-folder problem after a bad list import. Verifox cleaned the list and the warmup ran on the same engine. Back in primary inbox in six weeks. One vendor, half the cost.

Ran a 50,000-address outbound list through Verifox before our quarterly campaign. Bounces landed at 0.7%, sender reputation didn't move, replies were up 22% over last quarter.

Their MCP server let me wire email verification directly into our internal Claude agent in about ten minutes. Zero glue code. No other vendor in this space has thought about that workflow.

Tested Verifox at 10,000 verifications per minute on a Tuesday morning. Latency held under 400ms median, no soft failures, no rate-limit walls. The vendor we benched throttled at 2,000/min.

Our SDRs were enriching from three tools and 14% of the emails were invalid before they hit the sequencer. Verifox sits in the pipeline now and the team stopped seeing 'undeliverable' replies the next week.

Bulk upload, sorted CSV back in twenty minutes, plug into our growth stack. The half-day list-hygiene project per cohort turned into something the marketing intern runs on autopilot.

Verifox returns a 0-100 confidence score per address, not just a label. We thresholded at 75 for the cold sequencer, 60 for nurture, and our deliverability team finally has a knob they can tune.

We were paying ZeroBounce a four-figure monthly bill and still landing 3% bounces on cold campaigns. Switched the pipeline to Verifox, dropped to 0.4% bounces, and cut the bill by more than 90%.

We had a Gmail spam-folder problem after a bad list import. Verifox cleaned the list and the warmup ran on the same engine. Back in primary inbox in six weeks. One vendor, half the cost.

Their MCP server let me wire email verification directly into our internal Claude agent in about ten minutes. Zero glue code. No other vendor in this space has thought about that workflow.

Our SDRs were enriching from three tools and 14% of the emails were invalid before they hit the sequencer. Verifox sits in the pipeline now and the team stopped seeing 'undeliverable' replies the next week.

Verifox returns a 0-100 confidence score per address, not just a label. We thresholded at 75 for the cold sequencer, 60 for nurture, and our deliverability team finally has a knob they can tune.

Other tools flag 30% of our B2B list as 'risky catch-all' and leave the call to us. Verifox returns a real verdict on those addresses, with a confidence score. We send more, we send safer.

Ran a 50,000-address outbound list through Verifox before our quarterly campaign. Bounces landed at 0.7%, sender reputation didn't move, replies were up 22% over last quarter.

Tested Verifox at 10,000 verifications per minute on a Tuesday morning. Latency held under 400ms median, no soft failures, no rate-limit walls. The vendor we benched throttled at 2,000/min.

Bulk upload, sorted CSV back in twenty minutes, plug into our growth stack. The half-day list-hygiene project per cohort turned into something the marketing intern runs on autopilot.

We were paying ZeroBounce a four-figure monthly bill and still landing 3% bounces on cold campaigns. Switched the pipeline to Verifox, dropped to 0.4% bounces, and cut the bill by more than 90%.

Ran a 50,000-address outbound list through Verifox before our quarterly campaign. Bounces landed at 0.7%, sender reputation didn't move, replies were up 22% over last quarter.

Our SDRs were enriching from three tools and 14% of the emails were invalid before they hit the sequencer. Verifox sits in the pipeline now and the team stopped seeing 'undeliverable' replies the next week.

Other tools flag 30% of our B2B list as 'risky catch-all' and leave the call to us. Verifox returns a real verdict on those addresses, with a confidence score. We send more, we send safer.

Their MCP server let me wire email verification directly into our internal Claude agent in about ten minutes. Zero glue code. No other vendor in this space has thought about that workflow.

Bulk upload, sorted CSV back in twenty minutes, plug into our growth stack. The half-day list-hygiene project per cohort turned into something the marketing intern runs on autopilot.

We had a Gmail spam-folder problem after a bad list import. Verifox cleaned the list and the warmup ran on the same engine. Back in primary inbox in six weeks. One vendor, half the cost.

Tested Verifox at 10,000 verifications per minute on a Tuesday morning. Latency held under 400ms median, no soft failures, no rate-limit walls. The vendor we benched throttled at 2,000/min.

Verifox returns a 0-100 confidence score per address, not just a label. We thresholded at 75 for the cold sequencer, 60 for nurture, and our deliverability team finally has a knob they can tune.
Every layer of the stack carries a third-party attestation, so you can ship into regulated industries without rebuilding your compliance posture.

Independently audited to the SOC 2 Type II standard.

Built for the EU with full GDPR data-subject rights.

California opt-out, do-not-sell, plus DSAR handling.

Information security held to the ISO 27001 standard.

AI governance aligned to the new ISO 42001 standard.
An investigation into the money leaking out of your list - and the nine checks that decide whether your email is read, or never arrives at all.

57 pages, free PDF, no signup
Common questions
What teams ask before they trust a number over a “valid”: how the score is built, what counts as safe, and what to do with the middle of the list.
Email scoring rates each address on a 0 to 100 scale that estimates how likely a real, active person reads mail there, instead of the binary valid/invalid verdict a standard checker returns. Verifox builds the score from 40+ behavioral signals layered on top of the deterministic checks that email verification runs, then maps it to one of four tiers with a recommended action.
Four stages run in sequence: a behavioral fingerprint built from engagement signals like open recency, reply cadence, and device diversity; catch-all intelligence that probes the mail server beyond a simple RCPT TO check; pattern analysis against millions of known role, disposable, and generated-address templates; and a final synthesis that compresses everything into one 0 to 100 number with a tier assignment. Cached results return in under 50ms.
85 and above is safe to send: the mailbox is active and accepting mail. 50 to 84 is worth a look, so segment it into a slower cadence or re-engagement flow. 20 to 49 is risky and should sit out your primary campaigns. Anything under 20 is dead, fake, or a spam trap; remove it immediately. That one sort keeps bounce rates under the 2% threshold most mailbox providers punish.
Catch-all servers accept mail for any address, which is why 20 to 40% of B2B listsfail there and most validators return “unknown.” Verifox analyzes domain-level bounce history, known catch-all configurations, and behavioral engagement signals behind the SMTP response to resolve those addresses to a concrete score with 98.2% accuracy, including on Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 catch-all setups.
Verification answers “does this mailbox exist?” with deterministic checks: syntax, MX records, the SMTP handshake, disposable and role detection. Scoring answers “should I send here?” by adding behavioral evidence on top. You can try the binary checks free on the free email checker; scoring matters most where those checks stall, on the catch-all domains the 9-point verification engine flags.
The underlying verification engine measures 99.99% accuracy on a 1,000-address benchmark list, and the AI scoring layer resolves catch-all addresses at 98.2% accuracy, the segment where binary tools simply give up. Scores are probabilistic by design: a 92 is not a guarantee, it is a measured confidence level. The tier thresholds are calibrated so that acting on them keeps bounce rates below the 2% line.
Both. CSV upload handles bulk jobs at roughly 10,000 emails per minute on the standard tier, and the REST endpoints documented in the API reference return single scores at a median of ~380ms, sub-50ms when cached. AI agents can call the same engine through the native MCP server with no glue code.
Sort once, then act by tier: full sends to 85+, a slower nurture cadence for 50 to 84, suppression for 20 to 49, and immediate removal under 20. Teams running email warmup point early sends exclusively at the top tier to build reputation fast, then confirm the effect with an inbox placement test before opening up the middle of the list.
That is its main job. Bounces and spam-trap hits are what land senders on blocklists, and scoring removes both before you press send. One unscored campaign can push you past the 2% bounce threshold, and recovery takes 72+ hours once providers throttle you. Pair scoring with blacklist monitoring so that if something does slip through, you hear about the listing within minutes instead of weeks.
Sign up free and you get 1,000 credits, or 2,500 with a work email, no card required. Credits are pay-as-you-go, never expire, and the pricing page shows volume rates for your region. Addresses are processed in memory and discarded once scoring completes: nothing stored, logged, or sold, backed by SOC 2 Type II.