Send to the seed list
We give you a unique seed list of real addresses across 6 major providers. Send your campaign to that list exactly as you would to your real subscribers, no special formatting required.
Inbox Placement Test
Send one campaign to our seed address and see how it scores before you hit send.Send one campaign to our seed address and get its authentication verdict, spam score, and the exact fixes that move it.
Trusted by 500,000+ leading GTM teams
Nothing to install and no ESP migration. Send to the seed list, let the engine open every mailbox, then read the folder it found.
We give you a unique seed list of real addresses across 6 major providers. Send your campaign to that list exactly as you would to your real subscribers, no special formatting required.
Within minutes, our system logs into each seed mailbox and records where your email landed: primary inbox, promotions tab, spam folder, or missing entirely.
Get a per-provider breakdown with content analysis. See exactly what to change in your email before you send to your full list, usually within 5 minutes.
The whole page in one paragraph: what the test measures, what it cannot promise, and where the limits honestly sit.
An inbox placement test answers the question your ESP dashboard cannot: of the emails it marked delivered, how many were actually seen? You send one campaign to a seed list of real, monitored mailboxes at 6 major providers, and Verifox opens each one and records the folder your message was filed into — primary, Promotions, spam, or nowhere at all — and returns the per-provider breakdown in under 5 minutes, alongside six checks on the message itself so the number comes with a reason.
Your ESP reports delivered, which only means a server accepted the message. This reports the folder it was filed into, provider by provider.
A unique seed list of monitored addresses across six providers. You send to them exactly as you would to subscribers, so the message travels through the same filters, from the same domain, carrying the same headers. Nothing is modelled or predicted.

Each mailbox gets opened and the actual folder recorded: primary, Promotions, Updates, spam, or nothing at all. That distinction is the whole point, because Promotions and spam are wildly different problems and most reports collapse them into one number.

Six checks on the message itself: subject-line triggers, text-to-HTML ratio, image weight, linked domains, the List-Unsubscribe header Gmail and Yahoo now require, and a rule-by-rule SpamAssassin score. A placement number without a reason is just anxiety.

Change the subject, fix the header, finish the warmup ramp, then run it again. Two tests either side of a change turn “deliverability work” into a number that moved, which is the only version of it anyone can defend in a review.

Nobody can read a subscriber's inbox. A seed test can tell you which folder the same message landed in across the providers that matter.
Every result is a real delivery to a real mailbox, read after it lands.
Not one score. Where it landed at each mailbox we seed.
From send to a full per-provider breakdown you can act on.
Inbox, promotions, spam or missing, named for each mailbox.
The honest limit: seeds predict, they never read real inboxes.
1,000 free on signup. 2,500 with a work email. Pay as you go after.
Read once, dropped after the report. SOC 2 · GDPR · CCPA.
Most tools reset your balance every month. Verifox sells credits that sit in your account until you spend them.
forever
1,000credits on signup
No card required
2,500 with a work email
Free includes
one time
10,000credits
$0.0059 eachSAVE 34%
Everything in Free, plus
per month
15,000credits a month
$0.0053 each
Unused credits roll over
Everything in packs, plus
One credit verifies one address; a find costs 10. All prices in USD, checkout via Stripe.
Growth leads, marketers, and engineers running real campaigns on real lists, with a verified email on every byline.

We were paying ZeroBounce a four-figure monthly bill and still landing 3% bounces on cold campaigns. Switched the pipeline to Verifox, dropped to 0.4% bounces, and cut the bill by more than 90%.

Other tools flag 30% of our B2B list as 'risky catch-all' and leave the call to us. Verifox returns a real verdict on those addresses, with a confidence score. We send more, we send safer.

We had a Gmail spam-folder problem after a bad list import. Verifox cleaned the list and the warmup ran on the same engine. Back in primary inbox in six weeks. One vendor, half the cost.

Ran a 50,000-address outbound list through Verifox before our quarterly campaign. Bounces landed at 0.7%, sender reputation didn't move, replies were up 22% over last quarter.

Their MCP server let me wire email verification directly into our internal Claude agent in about ten minutes. Zero glue code. No other vendor in this space has thought about that workflow.

Tested Verifox at 10,000 verifications per minute on a Tuesday morning. Latency held under 400ms median, no soft failures, no rate-limit walls. The vendor we benched throttled at 2,000/min.

Our SDRs were enriching from three tools and 14% of the emails were invalid before they hit the sequencer. Verifox sits in the pipeline now and the team stopped seeing 'undeliverable' replies the next week.

Bulk upload, sorted CSV back in twenty minutes, plug into our growth stack. The half-day list-hygiene project per cohort turned into something the marketing intern runs on autopilot.

Verifox returns a 0-100 confidence score per address, not just a label. We thresholded at 75 for the cold sequencer, 60 for nurture, and our deliverability team finally has a knob they can tune.

We were paying ZeroBounce a four-figure monthly bill and still landing 3% bounces on cold campaigns. Switched the pipeline to Verifox, dropped to 0.4% bounces, and cut the bill by more than 90%.

We had a Gmail spam-folder problem after a bad list import. Verifox cleaned the list and the warmup ran on the same engine. Back in primary inbox in six weeks. One vendor, half the cost.

Their MCP server let me wire email verification directly into our internal Claude agent in about ten minutes. Zero glue code. No other vendor in this space has thought about that workflow.

Our SDRs were enriching from three tools and 14% of the emails were invalid before they hit the sequencer. Verifox sits in the pipeline now and the team stopped seeing 'undeliverable' replies the next week.

Verifox returns a 0-100 confidence score per address, not just a label. We thresholded at 75 for the cold sequencer, 60 for nurture, and our deliverability team finally has a knob they can tune.

Other tools flag 30% of our B2B list as 'risky catch-all' and leave the call to us. Verifox returns a real verdict on those addresses, with a confidence score. We send more, we send safer.

Ran a 50,000-address outbound list through Verifox before our quarterly campaign. Bounces landed at 0.7%, sender reputation didn't move, replies were up 22% over last quarter.

Tested Verifox at 10,000 verifications per minute on a Tuesday morning. Latency held under 400ms median, no soft failures, no rate-limit walls. The vendor we benched throttled at 2,000/min.

Bulk upload, sorted CSV back in twenty minutes, plug into our growth stack. The half-day list-hygiene project per cohort turned into something the marketing intern runs on autopilot.

We were paying ZeroBounce a four-figure monthly bill and still landing 3% bounces on cold campaigns. Switched the pipeline to Verifox, dropped to 0.4% bounces, and cut the bill by more than 90%.

Ran a 50,000-address outbound list through Verifox before our quarterly campaign. Bounces landed at 0.7%, sender reputation didn't move, replies were up 22% over last quarter.

Our SDRs were enriching from three tools and 14% of the emails were invalid before they hit the sequencer. Verifox sits in the pipeline now and the team stopped seeing 'undeliverable' replies the next week.

Other tools flag 30% of our B2B list as 'risky catch-all' and leave the call to us. Verifox returns a real verdict on those addresses, with a confidence score. We send more, we send safer.

Their MCP server let me wire email verification directly into our internal Claude agent in about ten minutes. Zero glue code. No other vendor in this space has thought about that workflow.

Bulk upload, sorted CSV back in twenty minutes, plug into our growth stack. The half-day list-hygiene project per cohort turned into something the marketing intern runs on autopilot.

We had a Gmail spam-folder problem after a bad list import. Verifox cleaned the list and the warmup ran on the same engine. Back in primary inbox in six weeks. One vendor, half the cost.

Tested Verifox at 10,000 verifications per minute on a Tuesday morning. Latency held under 400ms median, no soft failures, no rate-limit walls. The vendor we benched throttled at 2,000/min.

Verifox returns a 0-100 confidence score per address, not just a label. We thresholded at 75 for the cold sequencer, 60 for nurture, and our deliverability team finally has a knob they can tune.
Every layer of the stack carries a third-party attestation, so you can ship into regulated industries without rebuilding your compliance posture.

Independently audited to the SOC 2 Type II standard.

Built for the EU with full GDPR data-subject rights.

California opt-out, do-not-sell, plus DSAR handling.

Information security held to the ISO 27001 standard.

AI governance aligned to the new ISO 42001 standard.
An investigation into the money leaking out of your list - and the nine checks that decide whether your email is read, or never arrives at all.

57 pages, free PDF, no signup
Before you seed
How seed lists work, whether Promotions counts as a loss, how predictive the results really are, and what to fix first when the report comes back red.
An inbox placement test sends your email to a seed list of real mailboxes at major providers, then checks each one to record where the message landed: primary inbox, Promotions tab, spam folder, or nowhere at all. It measures the actual outcome of a send, per provider, instead of inferring it from open rates after the damage is done. Verifox covers 6 providers and returns the report in under 5 minutes.
A seed list is a set of real, monitored email addresses spread across Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo, Apple Mail, AOL, and Google Workspace. You add those addresses to your send exactly as if they were subscribers. Our system then opens each seed mailbox and logs the folder your email arrived in. Nothing is simulated: the message travels through the same filters your real subscribers’ mail does.
No. Promotions is still the inbox; subscribers see it, and engaged readers open it. Spam is invisible by default and actively damages sender reputation when messages sit unread. Treat Promotions as a tab-optimization problem (fewer images, fewer links, more personal tone) and spam as an emergency. If your mail sits in spam at multiple providers, start with email warmup and authentication, not subject-line tweaks.
A placement test measures the outcome: it checks real mailboxes and reports the folder your email landed in at each provider. A deliverability test audits the inputs: DNS, authentication, blacklist status, server setup. A spam check scores the message content alone. Run the input tests to find what to fix, then the placement test to confirm the fix worked.
Directionally, yes; exactly, no. Seed mailboxes share your real subscribers’ filters but not their engagement history, so an address that opens you weekly will place slightly better than the seed result, and a dead list will place worse. The biggest gap comes from list quality itself: 20 to 40% of B2B lists fail at catch-all domains. Clean the list with email verification before reading too much into either number.
Six: Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo, Apple Mail, AOL, and Google Workspace. Consumer Gmail and Google Workspace are tracked separately because their filtering behaves differently; Workspace admins layer custom rules on top of Google’s defaults. Each provider’s result shows inbox, spam, and missing percentages plus tab placement where the provider has tabs, so you see exactly which audience segment is at risk.
Authentication, then reputation, then content, in that order. Confirm SPF, DKIM, and DMARC all pass with the DMARC, DKIM, and SPF checker; unauthenticated mail loses before content is even read. Next, check whether your domain or IP is listed with the domain spam checker or blacklist check. Only then rework the content warnings from the placement report.
Before every major campaign at minimum, and monthly as a baseline even when nothing changes, because provider filters update quietly and placement drifts without warning. Add an extra test after any change to your template, sending domain, or ESP. Teams on pay-as-you-go credits typically budget a handful of tests per month per sending domain; credits never expire, so an unused month is never wasted.
Yes. Signing up is free, takes no card, and includes 1,000 credits, or 2,500 if you register with a work address. That covers your first placement tests plus enough verification to clean the list you are about to send to. When you outgrow the free credits, volume pricing is shown for your region on the pricing page.
Yes. Every test can be triggered and collected over REST, so you can run a placement check as a pre-send gate in your campaign pipeline and fail the deploy if inbox rate drops below your threshold. Endpoint shapes and auth are in the API docs. AI agents can drive the same engine through the native MCP server with no glue code.