Enter your sending domain
Give the test the domain your mail is sent from. No agent to install and no DNS access required; the test reads public records and live server behavior.
Email Server Test
Eight comprehensive checks SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MX, rDNS, TLS, BIMI, blacklist one letter grade, one prioritized fix list.
Trusted by 500,000+ leading GTM teams
No agent to install and no DNS access required. Enter the sending domain, let the 8-check engine grade it, then fix failures before warnings.
Give the test the domain your mail is sent from. No agent to install and no DNS access required; the test reads public records and live server behavior.
SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MX records, reverse DNS, TLS encryption, BIMI and blacklist status, each recorded with the exact record or server response found.
The report grades authentication, infrastructure, reputation, and compliance separately, so you fix outright failures first and warnings second.
It audits the machinery behind your mail: the DNS records and live server behaviour receivers inspect first.
An email server test audits the machinery behind your mail rather than the mail itself: the DNS records, policies, and live server behavior that receiving providers inspect before your message is ever opened. In one pass it answers eight questions. Is SPF published and valid? Is mail signed with DKIM? Does a DMARC policy tell receivers what to do when authentication fails? Do MX records exist? Does the sending IP have matching reverse DNS? Does the server negotiate TLS? Is a BIMI record showing your logo? And is the domain or IP sitting on a blacklist? Those eight checks are the configuration half of deliverability, the same signals our email verification engine reads on the receiving side of 2.1 billion+ verified emails.
One blended score hides the problem. Splitting the eight checks shows whether the weakness is authentication, infrastructure, reputation, or compliance.
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC read together rather than one at a time. Publishing all three is not the same as aligning them, and a domain with SPF and DKIM but no DMARC policy is still spoofable by anyone with a sending script.

MX records, reverse DNS, and TLS negotiation, checked against the live server rather than assumed. A PTR record that does not match the sending hostname reads to a receiver exactly like spam infrastructure, whatever your content says.

The domain and every sending IP behind it queried against the public blocklists that receivers actually consult. A listing here is refused at the handshake, so it never reaches the spam folder where you might have spotted it.

The Google and Yahoo bulk-sender requirements and BIMI readiness, graded separately so a cosmetic warning never outranks a real failure. Every finding arrives with the exact record we read, not just a verdict.

A mail server either agrees with itself or it does not. This test reads every record receivers check and grades what it finds.
Every record is read live from DNS and the server, never from a cache.
A+ to F across four categories, each with the exact record.
SPF, DKIM and DMARC have to line up, not merely exist.
What Google and Yahoo began enforcing, and whether you pass.
So you fix the record that fails, not the one you suspect.
1,000 free on signup. 2,500 with a work email. Pay as you go after.
Tested in memory, dropped on response. SOC 2 · GDPR · CCPA.
Most tools reset your balance every month. Verifox sells credits that sit in your account until you spend them.
forever
1,000credits on signup
No card required
2,500 with a work email
Free includes
one time
10,000credits
$0.0059 eachSAVE 34%
Everything in Free, plus
per month
15,000credits a month
$0.0053 each
Unused credits roll over
Everything in packs, plus
One credit verifies one address; a find costs 10. All prices in USD, checkout via Stripe.
Growth leads, marketers, and engineers running real campaigns on real lists, with a verified email on every byline.

We were paying ZeroBounce a four-figure monthly bill and still landing 3% bounces on cold campaigns. Switched the pipeline to Verifox, dropped to 0.4% bounces, and cut the bill by more than 90%.

Other tools flag 30% of our B2B list as 'risky catch-all' and leave the call to us. Verifox returns a real verdict on those addresses, with a confidence score. We send more, we send safer.

We had a Gmail spam-folder problem after a bad list import. Verifox cleaned the list and the warmup ran on the same engine. Back in primary inbox in six weeks. One vendor, half the cost.

Ran a 50,000-address outbound list through Verifox before our quarterly campaign. Bounces landed at 0.7%, sender reputation didn't move, replies were up 22% over last quarter.

Their MCP server let me wire email verification directly into our internal Claude agent in about ten minutes. Zero glue code. No other vendor in this space has thought about that workflow.

Tested Verifox at 10,000 verifications per minute on a Tuesday morning. Latency held under 400ms median, no soft failures, no rate-limit walls. The vendor we benched throttled at 2,000/min.

Our SDRs were enriching from three tools and 14% of the emails were invalid before they hit the sequencer. Verifox sits in the pipeline now and the team stopped seeing 'undeliverable' replies the next week.

Bulk upload, sorted CSV back in twenty minutes, plug into our growth stack. The half-day list-hygiene project per cohort turned into something the marketing intern runs on autopilot.

Verifox returns a 0-100 confidence score per address, not just a label. We thresholded at 75 for the cold sequencer, 60 for nurture, and our deliverability team finally has a knob they can tune.

We were paying ZeroBounce a four-figure monthly bill and still landing 3% bounces on cold campaigns. Switched the pipeline to Verifox, dropped to 0.4% bounces, and cut the bill by more than 90%.

We had a Gmail spam-folder problem after a bad list import. Verifox cleaned the list and the warmup ran on the same engine. Back in primary inbox in six weeks. One vendor, half the cost.

Their MCP server let me wire email verification directly into our internal Claude agent in about ten minutes. Zero glue code. No other vendor in this space has thought about that workflow.

Our SDRs were enriching from three tools and 14% of the emails were invalid before they hit the sequencer. Verifox sits in the pipeline now and the team stopped seeing 'undeliverable' replies the next week.

Verifox returns a 0-100 confidence score per address, not just a label. We thresholded at 75 for the cold sequencer, 60 for nurture, and our deliverability team finally has a knob they can tune.

Other tools flag 30% of our B2B list as 'risky catch-all' and leave the call to us. Verifox returns a real verdict on those addresses, with a confidence score. We send more, we send safer.

Ran a 50,000-address outbound list through Verifox before our quarterly campaign. Bounces landed at 0.7%, sender reputation didn't move, replies were up 22% over last quarter.

Tested Verifox at 10,000 verifications per minute on a Tuesday morning. Latency held under 400ms median, no soft failures, no rate-limit walls. The vendor we benched throttled at 2,000/min.

Bulk upload, sorted CSV back in twenty minutes, plug into our growth stack. The half-day list-hygiene project per cohort turned into something the marketing intern runs on autopilot.

We were paying ZeroBounce a four-figure monthly bill and still landing 3% bounces on cold campaigns. Switched the pipeline to Verifox, dropped to 0.4% bounces, and cut the bill by more than 90%.

Ran a 50,000-address outbound list through Verifox before our quarterly campaign. Bounces landed at 0.7%, sender reputation didn't move, replies were up 22% over last quarter.

Our SDRs were enriching from three tools and 14% of the emails were invalid before they hit the sequencer. Verifox sits in the pipeline now and the team stopped seeing 'undeliverable' replies the next week.

Other tools flag 30% of our B2B list as 'risky catch-all' and leave the call to us. Verifox returns a real verdict on those addresses, with a confidence score. We send more, we send safer.

Their MCP server let me wire email verification directly into our internal Claude agent in about ten minutes. Zero glue code. No other vendor in this space has thought about that workflow.

Bulk upload, sorted CSV back in twenty minutes, plug into our growth stack. The half-day list-hygiene project per cohort turned into something the marketing intern runs on autopilot.

We had a Gmail spam-folder problem after a bad list import. Verifox cleaned the list and the warmup ran on the same engine. Back in primary inbox in six weeks. One vendor, half the cost.

Tested Verifox at 10,000 verifications per minute on a Tuesday morning. Latency held under 400ms median, no soft failures, no rate-limit walls. The vendor we benched throttled at 2,000/min.

Verifox returns a 0-100 confidence score per address, not just a label. We thresholded at 75 for the cold sequencer, 60 for nurture, and our deliverability team finally has a knob they can tune.
Every layer of the stack carries a third-party attestation, so you can ship into regulated industries without rebuilding your compliance posture.

Independently audited to the SOC 2 Type II standard.

Built for the EU with full GDPR data-subject rights.

California opt-out, do-not-sell, plus DSAR handling.

Information security held to the ISO 27001 standard.

AI governance aligned to the new ISO 42001 standard.
An investigation into the money leaking out of your list - and the nine checks that decide whether your email is read, or never arrives at all.

57 pages, free PDF, no signup
Common questions
What the test covers, why SPF and DMARC fail, what each grade means, and where a server test ends.
Eight things in one pass: SPF, DKIM signing keys, DMARC policy, MX records, reverse DNS, TLS encryption, BIMI, and blacklist status. Those cover the four areas receivers actually score, authentication, infrastructure, reputation, and compliance. Each check returns pass, warn, or fail with the exact record we found. It audits the domain and server, not individual addresses; the email verification service handles mailbox-level checks.
Yes. Signing up gets you 1,000 free credits, or 2,500 with a work email, no card required, and the server test runs from the same dashboard. Credits are pay-as-you-go and never expire; volume rates are localized on the pricing page. Want zero signup? The authentication slice of the test, SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, runs free right now on the SPF, DKIM and DMARC checker.
Almost always because no TXT record exists at _dmarc.yourdomain.com, or the record that does exist has a syntax error receivers cannot parse. Publish at minimum v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:[email protected] to start collecting reports, then tighten to quarantine or reject. Once it passes, the DMARC monitor reads those reports for you continuously.
Add one TXT record at your domain root listing every service that sends for you, for example v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all for Google Workspace. Two rules trip most people: a domain may publish only one SPF record, so merge providers into a single string, and the record may trigger at most 10 DNS lookups. Re-run the free SPF check after DNS propagates to confirm the fix.
A or A+ means every receiver-scored check passes and your setup is not the reason mail lands in spam. B means the essentials pass but warnings remain, typically a missing BIMI record or a DMARC policy still at p=none. C or F means at least one authentication or reputation check fails outright, and that is where deliverability damage is concentrated. Fix fails before warnings: a missing DMARC record costs you far more than a missing logo.
Run the test after every change to DNS, your ESP, or your sending infrastructure, and monthly as a baseline even when nothing changed, because records get edited by other teams and certificates expire quietly. Reputation moves faster than configuration: blacklist operators add and remove entries daily, so pair the periodic test with blacklist monitoring and a one-off email blacklist check whenever engagement suddenly drops.
Scope. An SMTP test checks one connection: can a specific server be reached on its port and complete a handshake. An email server test audits the whole sending domain, the DNS records, authentication policies, encryption, and reputation that decide how receivers treat your mail once that connection works. If mail is not leaving at all, start with the SMTP test; if it leaves but lands in spam, start here.
No. It removes the configuration reasons for spam placement, which is necessary but not sufficient. List quality and engagement still decide the rest: 20 to 40% of B2B lists fail at catch-all domains alone, and bounces from bad addresses erode the reputation a clean server earned. Verify your list with the 9-point verification engine, then measure where real campaigns land with an inbox placement test.
Yes. The REST API exposes the same domain and authentication checks the dashboard runs, so you can test servers from CI after DNS changes or audit every domain on a customer list. AI agents connect through the native MCP server with no glue code. Everything runs on the same pay-as-you-go credits, and results return as structured JSON you can alert on.